From: Romain D. <do...@ir...> - 2001-06-19 14:44:19
|
Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Sven LUTHER wrote: > > BTW, forgive me if i am being stupid, but why not doing a bitwise not ? > > Because that would invert too many bits. I think Sven was thinking of a bitwise not with an hardware mask set to 0x0F0F0F0F, which should have the same result, and with the added benefit that there's no need to transfer the second source of the XOR. So it's easier to do on the permedia3 :-) -- DOLBEAU Romain | l'histoire est entierement vraie, puisque ENS Cachan / Ker Lann | je l'ai imaginee d'un bout a l'autre do...@ir... | -- Boris Vian |