|
From: Tea A. <th...@vi...> - 2001-04-03 16:35:09
|
On Tuesday 03 April 2001 18:03, Adrian Cox wrote: > Jordan Crouse wrote: > > Now what we need is a volunteer to help us get all this stuff merged > > out. No matter what we finally come up with, I don't think we should > > let another kernel release go by > > without some contributions. > > I've got a contract to support a machine with two 69030s supporting two > monitors and two panels. I'm going to have to merge a lot of this code > anyway over the next few weeks. So yes, I guess I'm volunteering. > Sounds good! I could offer some testing on a ct65554 and a ct69000 (intel boxes). ctfb0.50 is stable on my ct69000 (last versions not testet on the ct65554). Feel free to use the code as you like. > What do people actually want the driver to do? Should we attempt to > support the entire Chips/Asiliant range in one driver, or separate out > the early IO based devices from the later memory mapped devices? I don't > have access to the earlier devices, so I'll be fumbling in the dark with > them unless somebody is prepared to mail me a card. > If there is no test posibility for old devices the question is already anwered. Thomas |