Re: [Linux-fbdev-users] latest version of radeonfb

[Torgeir V. <to...@po...>]

On Fri, 2004-11-19 at 12:55 +0100, Olaf Leidinger wrote:

> Okay... but when booting using the fb providet by radeonfb I get no
> accel (fbset -i tells it is deactivated) . So I patched radeonfb to set
> info->fix.accel = FB_ACCEL_ATI_RADEON (similar to the aty-driver). Now
> directfb loads its radeon driver but it exits immediately...
> 
> This part of the patch I discoverd after I tried my self-made hack seems
> to do the same (if not more ;-) ) but it isn't part of radeon_base.c as
> it ships with linux-2.6.9
>  -	if (noaccel)
>  -	        info->fix.accel = FB_ACCEL_NONE;
>  -	else
>  -		info->fix.accel = FB_ACCEL_ATI_RADEON;
>  -
>  -	fb_alloc_cmap(&info->cmap, 256, 0);
>  -
>  -	if (noaccel)
>  +	if (noaccel) {
>  +		info->fix.accel = FB_ACCEL_NONE;
>   		info->var.accel_flags &= ~FB_ACCELF_TEXT;
>  -	else
>  +		info->fbops = &radeonfb_noaccel_ops;
>  +	} else {
>  +		info->fix.accel = FB_ACCEL_ATI_RADEON;
>   		info->var.accel_flags |= FB_ACCELF_TEXT;
>  +		info->fbops = &radeonfb_ops;
>  +	}
>  +	fb_alloc_cmap(&info->cmap, 256, 0);
> 
> Nor the lines that the patch removes are part of the official radeon_base.c

Which kernel is this? My 2.6.10-rc1 kernel doesn't define the
radeon_noaccel_ops.. Or is it the old radeon driver? The new one is the
one in aty/* .

-- 
Torgeir Veimo <to...@po...>