From: Jon S. <jon...@gm...> - 2004-10-17 22:23:11
|
On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 23:47:15 +0800, Antonino A. Daplas <ad...@ho...> wrote: > IMO, I believe that the cursor ioctl should just be removed :-) The merged fbdev/DRM needs hardware cursor support in fbdev but it doesn't need the fbdev cursor IOCTL. Moving cursor support to fbcon won't work either. Implementing cursor support in merged fbdev/DRM probably means a modified API since we have to deal with multiple heads. Are there cards still out there with no hardware cursor support? How many apps use the user space fbdev interface? Also, a some point I would like to revisit the fbcon/fbdev interface and reduce the number of fbdev variables fbcon can access but doesn't use. fbcon shouldn't have direct access to the fb_info struct, there should be more of an interface there. -- Jon Smirl jon...@gm... |