From: Jonathan C. <co...@lw...> - 2010-04-09 20:11:36
|
On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 05:20:28 +0200 Florian Tobias Schandinat <Flo...@gm...> wrote: > Just a minor nit: > Could we change the default so that if someone adds support for a new > IGP (and misses this function) we default to either the newest or > preferably to none? I've just seen too much poorly maintained code in > this driver and defaulting to the oldest is hence a bad idea. > Otherwise it's fine. That would require making an exhaustive list of older chipset types. It could probably be inferred through inspection of the code, but I worry about making assumptions in this area... Thanks, jon |