From: Andrew M. <ak...@li...> - 2010-03-30 23:03:10
|
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 12:24:24 +0900 InKi Dae <da...@gm...> wrote: > +static int s6e63m0_ldi_init(struct s6e63m0 *lcd) > +{ > + int ret; > + > + ret = s6e63m0_panel_send_sequence(lcd, SEQ_PANEL_CONDITION_SET); > + ret |= s6e63m0_panel_send_sequence(lcd, SEQ_DISPLAY_CONDITION_SET); > + ret |= s6e63m0_panel_send_sequence(lcd, SEQ_GAMMA_SETTING); > + ret |= s6e63m0_panel_send_sequence(lcd, SEQ_ETC_CONDITION_SET); > + ret |= s6e63m0_panel_send_sequence(lcd, SEQ_ACL_ON); > + ret |= s6e63m0_panel_send_sequence(lcd, SEQ_ELVSS_ON); > + > + return ret; > +} Well. If one call to s6e63m0_panel_send_sequence() returns -ENOMEM and another call returns -EIO (for example), this function will return some other, incorrect errno. Which is a rather minor problem, unless some caller is explicitly looking for some particular error code, which doesn't happen often. |