From: Andrew M. <ak...@li...> - 2010-03-23 19:12:39
|
On Mon, 15 Mar 2010 08:39:20 +0200 Baruch Siach <ba...@tk...> wrote: > Hi Krzysztof, > > On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 10:53:29PM +0100, Krzysztof Helt wrote: > > From: Krzysztof Helt <krz...@wp...> > > > > There are two new options inside the CONFIG_FB section which do not > > depend on the CONFIG_FB. This break Kconfig menu layout. > > > > Fix it and reduce few conditions for sparc frame buffers > > as the FB_SBUS == ((FB = y) && SPARC). > > > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Helt <krz...@wp...> > > --- > > > > --- linux-orig/drivers/video/Kconfig 2010-03-14 23:54:39.000000000 +0100 > > +++ linux-git/drivers/video/Kconfig 2010-03-15 00:05:59.000000000 +0100 > > @@ -400,12 +400,9 @@ config FB_SA1100 > > If you plan to use the LCD display with your SA-1100 system, say > > Y here. > > > > -config HAVE_FB_IMX > > - bool > > - > > config FB_IMX > > tristate "Motorola i.MX LCD support" > > - depends on FB && (HAVE_FB_IMX || ARCH_MX1 || ARCH_MX2) > > + depends on FB && (ARCH_MX1 || ARCH_MX2) > > This hunk reverts f6014419 (imxfb: add support for i.MX25). Is this > intentional? > Did this question get addressed? Thanks. |