From: James S. <jsi...@in...> - 2010-03-11 15:17:45
|
> >> It would be nice to find a way to reclaim the console memory for X, > >> but I'm not sure that can be done and still provide a good way to > >> provide oops support. > > > > What do you think the average user will care about more? > > > > * Seeing kernel oops/panic output about once in a lifetime. > > * Being able to start/use X in the first place and enabling it to > > use all of VRAM. > > > > Personally, I've never even seen any kernel oops/panic output despite > > numerous opportunities for that in the couple of months I've been using > > KMS. But I have spent considerable time and effort trying to get rid of > > the pinned fbcon BO. If the oops/panic output is the only thing > > preventing that, maybe that should only be enabled via some module > > option for developers. > > I'm all for it! I'm looking into the details for this. It will require some changes to internal apis to make it to work. |