From: Janusz K. <jkr...@ti...> - 2009-10-29 23:48:37
|
Thursday 29 October 2009 23:39:44 Janusz Krzysztofik napisał(a): > > Since PM area is quite new to me, I am not sure if there may be a better > solution. AFAICS, the standard way to prevent an ARM_CLKCT1 bit being s/ARM_CLKCT1/ARM_IDLECT1/ > switched to idle is to enable a clock that uses it (tipb_ck, dma_ck, or > tc_ck or one of its children in this case, right?). Janusz |