From: Daniel M. <da...@ca...> - 2009-09-11 15:20:36
|
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 03:33:27PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote: > On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 03:31:34PM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > > > + if (cpu_is_pxa3xx() && inf->acceleration_enabled) > > > + fbi->fb.fix.accel = FB_ACCEL_PXA3XX; > > > + > > > > Ok, now remove 'cpu_is_pxa3xx() && ' above and you should be good to go:-) > > What if tomorrow pxa4xx comes (ok, Eric will disagree, but wtill:-)) > > Don't know. I left it in there intentionally, but I'm fine to remove it. > Or Eric does it when applying ;) Eric? What I was considering are cases where a kernel binary that works on both PXA3xx and other PXAs shares the same pxafb_mach_info struct across different board support code. The accel flag would then be set for wrong platforms. But this might be academic, that's why I don't have a strong opinion on that :) Daniel |