From: H H. S. <har...@vi...> - 2009-07-20 22:22:56
|
On Monday, July 20, 2009 3:15 PM, Russell King wrote: > On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 04:42:09PM -0400, H Hartley Sweeten wrote: >> I'm not sure which tag is appropriate for this patch. So here's both. >> >> Signed-off-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsw...@vi...> >> Acked-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsw...@vi...> > > If you're directly involved in the patch delivery path, then the > sign-off is what's required. In other words, you take someone elses > patch, decide you're happy with it and want to pass it along yourself. > > If you've just reviewed it and are happy with it, then it's the > acked-by which is needed. Or use one of the more specific > Reviewed-by, Tested-by etc (whatever seems most appropriate for > the amount of review or checking you've done.) Thanks Russell. Based on that information, my tag for this part of the patch should be: Acked-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsw...@vi...> |