|
From: Yauhen K. <je...@gm...> - 2008-07-13 19:24:13
|
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 03:03:05AM +0800, Jaya Kumar wrote: > On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 8:20 PM, Mikhail Gusarov > <dot...@do...> wrote: > > Twas brillig at 11:02:29 13.07.2008 UTC+08 when jay...@gm... did gyre and gimble: > > > > JK> However, I should point out that hecubafb is a driver for this same > > JK> apollo controller. > > > > AFAICT from the diff, eink_apollofb already includes all the features of > > hecubafb, so that would be just renaming. Is it worth it? > > > > -- > > > > Hi Mikhail, > > Looking at the posted code, it is the same code as hecubafb, renamed, > and with the 2-bit, partial update, and flash features added. Hardware abstraction layer (with platform_device framework) and rotation also :) > The new > features are good but basically, its a fork of hecubafb. I'm > suggesting that rather than doing that, it would make more sense to > add those features to the existing hecubafb code. If any help is > needed in making that happen, please let me know, I'm happy to help. I am agreed. I saw 'Apollo' name more frequently than any other, but it is not a matter of principe. -- Yauhen Kharuzhy jekhor _at_ gmail.com JID: je...@ja... A: No Q: Should I quote below my post? |