|
From: Maciej W. R. <ma...@ds...> - 2003-08-14 12:49:28
|
On Thu, 14 Aug 2003, Thiemo Seufer wrote: > > I've looked at the patch and have changed the barriers as I deem > > appropriate. But while doing this, I've noticed the code is insonsistent > > in a few places -- has it been successfully verified on real hardware? > > It works on my /260. Which parts look weird to you? 1. bt431_write_reg_inc() uses u16 for value, even though it only uses 8 bits (which of course makes all the calls in bt431_init_cursor() dubious). 2. bt431_load_cursor_sprite() loads control registers instead of the cursor map. See the patch for details. You may use `diff -b' to get rid of spacing clean-ups -- this makes my updates quite clear. Maciej -- + Maciej W. Rozycki, Technical University of Gdansk, Poland + +--------------------------------------------------------------+ + e-mail: ma...@ds..., PGP key available + |