linux-fbdev-devel

[Linux-fbdev-devel] fbdev BK tree ready for testing.

[James S. <jsi...@tr...>]

Hi!

   I just finished sending up the last large change I like to send to
Linus for the framebuffer changes. Since I can't test all the
possible hardware there I like to ask people to test the BK
tree out. Once I have positive reports I like to merge it with Linus BK
tree. Thank you.


http://fbdev.bkbits.net/fbdev-2.5

   . ---
   |o_o |
   |:_/ |   Give Micro$oft the Bird!!!!
  //   \ \  Use Linux!!!!
 (|     | )
 /'_   _/`\
 ___)=(___/

[Linux-fbdev-devel] Re: fbdev BK tree ready for testing.

[Jes S. <je...@wi...>]

>>>>> "James" == James Simmons <jsi...@tr...> writes:

James> Hi!

James>    I just finished sending up the last large change I like to
James> send to Linus for the framebuffer changes. Since I can't test
James> all the possible hardware there I like to ask people to test
James> the BK tree out. Once I have positive reports I like to merge
James> it with Linus BK tree. Thank you.

James> http://fbdev.bkbits.net/fbdev-2.5

ARGH

If you want people to test out the patches, posting a bitkeeper only
URL is totally unreasonable!

This is exactly what caused the long flame on linux-kernel the other
day ;-(

Jes

[Linux-fbdev-devel] Re: fbdev BK tree ready for testing.

[James S. <jsi...@tr...>]

> James> http://fbdev.bkbits.net/fbdev-2.5
> 
> ARGH
> 
> If you want people to test out the patches, posting a bitkeeper only
> URL is totally unreasonable!
> 
> This is exactly what caused the long flame on linux-kernel the other
> day ;-(

:-( 

Here is a standard diff patch against 2.5.9. 

http://www.transvirtual.com/~jsimmons/new_fbdev.diff.gz

Please test it out. Patches welcomed.