On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 12:11:37 -0700
Andrew Morton <ak...@li...> wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Mar 2010 08:39:20 +0200
> Baruch Siach <ba...@tk...> wrote:
>
> > Hi Krzysztof,
> >
> > On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 10:53:29PM +0100, Krzysztof Helt wrote:
> > > From: Krzysztof Helt <krz...@wp...>
> > >
> > > There are two new options inside the CONFIG_FB section which do not
> > > depend on the CONFIG_FB. This break Kconfig menu layout.
> > >
> > > Fix it and reduce few conditions for sparc frame buffers
> > > as the FB_SBUS == ((FB = y) && SPARC).
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Helt <krz...@wp...>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > --- linux-orig/drivers/video/Kconfig 2010-03-14 23:54:39.000000000 +0100
> > > +++ linux-git/drivers/video/Kconfig 2010-03-15 00:05:59.000000000 +0100
> > > @@ -400,12 +400,9 @@ config FB_SA1100
> > > If you plan to use the LCD display with your SA-1100 system, say
> > > Y here.
> > >
> > > -config HAVE_FB_IMX
> > > - bool
> > > -
> > > config FB_IMX
> > > tristate "Motorola i.MX LCD support"
> > > - depends on FB && (HAVE_FB_IMX || ARCH_MX1 || ARCH_MX2)
> > > + depends on FB && (ARCH_MX1 || ARCH_MX2)
> >
> > This hunk reverts f6014419 (imxfb: add support for i.MX25). Is this
> > intentional?
> >
>
> Did this question get addressed?
>
> Thanks.
<a month passes>
Krzysztof?
|
