Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs:Add adjustable write endpoints for multiple devices
Brought to you by:
kjgkr
From: Chao Yu <ch...@ke...> - 2025-07-28 07:56:42
|
On 7/23/25 16:49, Liao Yuanhong wrote: > During the development process, we encounter the following two issues: > > 1.In a multi-device scenario, it's likely that two devices exhibit > inconsistent performance, causing fluctuations in performance and making > usage and testing inconvenient. Under normal circumstances, we hope to > prioritize the use of the device with better performance and consider the > device with poorer performance when space is insufficient. Using reuse > mode can solve some of the issues, but tests reveal that the fragmentation > degree in reuse mode is significantly higher than in default mode, which > poses performance risks. > > 2.We need to examine the differences in data placement for different sizes > of storage devices under specific write patterns. Currently, this > comparison can only be made by switching storage devices. > > To address the above issues, I am considering adding a last_secno node. By > adjusting this node, we can change the end of the addressing in > get_new_segment so that it readdresses from 0 once the set value is > reached. The default value of the node is the maximum number of sections > for the current storage device, so making no modifications will not affect > the current logic. If the space before the set value is already filled with > valid data, it will normally write into the free area after the set value. > > Signed-off-by: Liao Yuanhong <lia...@vi...> > --- > Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-fs-f2fs | 8 ++++++++ > fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 1 + > fs/f2fs/segment.c | 4 ++-- > fs/f2fs/super.c | 1 + > fs/f2fs/sysfs.c | 9 +++++++++ > 5 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-fs-f2fs b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-fs-f2fs > index c2a233f2a085..e5ad8dc70cb6 100644 > --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-fs-f2fs > +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-fs-f2fs > @@ -870,3 +870,11 @@ Description: This threshold is used to control triggering garbage collection whi > reserved section before preallocating on pinned file. > By default, the value is ovp_sections, especially, for zoned ufs, the > value is 1. > + > +What: /sys/fs/f2fs/<disk>/last_secno > +Date: July 2025 > +Contact: "Yuanhong Liao" <lia...@vi...> > +Description: This node is used to adjust the addressing end of f2fs when writing. > + The default value is the maximum number of sections in the storage. If the > + frontend space is full after adjusting the address, it will still address to > + the back of the address until reaching the end of the memory. > \ No newline at end of file > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h > index e6dcd7e6f47c..7d93d8671033 100644 > --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h > +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h > @@ -1802,6 +1802,7 @@ struct f2fs_sb_info { > spinlock_t dev_lock; /* protect dirty_device */ > bool aligned_blksize; /* all devices has the same logical blksize */ > unsigned int first_seq_zone_segno; /* first segno in sequential zone */ > + unsigned int last_secno; /* for adjust the end of target device */ > > /* For write statistics */ > u64 sectors_written_start; > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c > index cc82d42ef14c..192619bb2034 100644 > --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c > +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c > @@ -2811,7 +2811,7 @@ static int get_new_segment(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, > secno = find_next_zero_bit(free_i->free_secmap, MAIN_SECS(sbi), hint); > > #ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_ZONED > - if (secno >= MAIN_SECS(sbi) && f2fs_sb_has_blkzoned(sbi)) { > + if (secno >= sbi->last_secno && f2fs_sb_has_blkzoned(sbi)) { > /* Write only to sequential zones */ > if (sbi->blkzone_alloc_policy == BLKZONE_ALLOC_ONLY_SEQ) { > hint = GET_SEC_FROM_SEG(sbi, sbi->first_seq_zone_segno); > @@ -2827,7 +2827,7 @@ static int get_new_segment(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, > } > #endif > > - if (secno >= MAIN_SECS(sbi)) { > + if (secno >= sbi->last_secno) { > secno = find_first_zero_bit(free_i->free_secmap, > MAIN_SECS(sbi)); > if (secno >= MAIN_SECS(sbi)) { > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c > index 30c038413040..5b7de0734da7 100644 > --- a/fs/f2fs/super.c > +++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c > @@ -3859,6 +3859,7 @@ static int sanity_check_raw_super(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, > segs_per_sec = le32_to_cpu(raw_super->segs_per_sec); > secs_per_zone = le32_to_cpu(raw_super->secs_per_zone); > total_sections = le32_to_cpu(raw_super->section_count); > + sbi->last_secno = total_sections; > > /* blocks_per_seg should be 512, given the above check */ > blocks_per_seg = BIT(le32_to_cpu(raw_super->log_blocks_per_seg)); > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c b/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c > index bdef926b3377..a4ab5c38e883 100644 > --- a/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c > +++ b/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c > @@ -649,6 +649,13 @@ static ssize_t __sbi_store(struct f2fs_attr *a, > return count; > } > > + if (!strcmp(a->attr.name, "last_secno")) { > + if (t < 0 || t > MAIN_SECS(sbi)) > + return -EINVAL; > + sbi->last_secno = t; Will this race w/ f2fs_ioc_resize_fs() which will update MAIN_SECS()? Thanks, > + return count; > + } > + > #ifdef CONFIG_F2FS_IOSTAT > if (!strcmp(a->attr.name, "iostat_enable")) { > sbi->iostat_enable = !!t; > @@ -1122,6 +1129,7 @@ F2FS_SBI_GENERAL_RW_ATTR(max_victim_search); > F2FS_SBI_GENERAL_RW_ATTR(migration_granularity); > F2FS_SBI_GENERAL_RW_ATTR(migration_window_granularity); > F2FS_SBI_GENERAL_RW_ATTR(dir_level); > +F2FS_SBI_GENERAL_RW_ATTR(last_secno); > #ifdef CONFIG_F2FS_IOSTAT > F2FS_SBI_GENERAL_RW_ATTR(iostat_enable); > F2FS_SBI_GENERAL_RW_ATTR(iostat_period_ms); > @@ -1285,6 +1293,7 @@ static struct attribute *f2fs_attrs[] = { > ATTR_LIST(discard_idle_interval), > ATTR_LIST(gc_idle_interval), > ATTR_LIST(umount_discard_timeout), > + ATTR_LIST(last_secno), > #ifdef CONFIG_F2FS_IOSTAT > ATTR_LIST(iostat_enable), > ATTR_LIST(iostat_period_ms), |