Re: Re: [Linux-decnet-user] LATD 0.8

[Patrick C. <pa...@pa...>]

>> I can understand why it was kept proprietary - it was just the prevailing >mood > at the time. 
>
>Yet, all the other protocols in the DECnet suite were public?
>
>
>Doesn't really make sense to me...

yes but LAT post-dates DECnet by some time


patrick