Re: [Linux-decnet-user] LATD 0.8

[Kenn H. <ke...@li...>]

On Thu, Jun 29, 2000 at 08:55:02PM +0100, Patrick Caulfield wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2000 at 11:51:52PM +0100, Kenn Humborg wrote:
> > Why were they so insistent on keeping it proprietary?
>
> I can understand why it was kept proprietary - it was just the prevailing mood
> at the time. 

Yet, all the other protocols in the DECnet suite were public?

Doesn't really make sense to me...

Later,
Kenn