From: Jorge B. [DTI2] <jo...@dt...> - 2011-11-21 20:39:55
|
From: "Jorge Boncompte [DTI2]" <jo...@dt...> This snippet has caused several bugs in the past, and I don't see the point on substracting the skb len from netdev stats. Signed-off-by: Jorge Boncompte [DTI2] <jo...@dt...> --- net/atm/br2684.c | 9 +-------- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/atm/br2684.c b/net/atm/br2684.c index d07223c..81cf33b 100644 --- a/net/atm/br2684.c +++ b/net/atm/br2684.c @@ -557,15 +557,8 @@ static int br2684_regvcc(struct atm_vcc *atmvcc, void __user * arg) skb_queue_splice_init(rq, &queue); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rq->lock, flags); - skb_queue_walk_safe(&queue, skb, tmp) { - struct net_device *dev; - + skb_queue_walk_safe(&queue, skb, tmp) br2684_push(atmvcc, skb); - dev = skb->dev; - - dev->stats.rx_bytes -= skb->len; - dev->stats.rx_packets--; - } /* initialize netdev carrier state */ if (atmvcc->dev->signal == ATM_PHY_SIG_LOST) -- 1.7.7.1 |