Re: [Linux-ATM-General] Miscellaneous patches not in 2.5.2

[Chas W. (CONTRACTOR) <ch...@cm...>]

In message <4D3...@re...>,Philip Prindeville writes:
>All of the first patch applies...

those changes seem pretty harmless.  the int/socklen_t has been an
issue forever.  int should be the same size as socklen_t but if it
isnt bad things will happen.

>The second patch seems to disable linking with Flex.
>Can we make flex an autoconf option, i.e. --disable-flex ?

we shouldnt be linking with -lfl unless we are actually using flex.
if we dont need it, we shouldnt link it.