[Linecontrol-development] segfault problem in linesrv still occurs

[Joao C. <jp...@rn...>]

Dump of my /var/log/daemon.log :

Oct  7 20:37:54 lfsPentiumRouter linesrv[1996]: LineControl ML Server 2.1.4
started.
Oct  7 20:38:05 lfsPentiumRouter linesrv[1996]: 192.168.1.8:1102 registered
Oct  7 20:42:05 lfsPentiumRouter linesrv[1996]: cleanup(): cought signal 11
(...)
Oct  7 20:42:15 lfsPentiumRouter linesrv[1996]: 1 lines are still active.
Close them manually!
Oct  7 20:42:15 lfsPentiumRouter linesrv[1996]: SEGFAULT, please report to
sf...@gm...
Oct  7 20:42:15 lfsPentiumRouter linesrv[1996]: Value of segf_indicator: 16
Oct  7 20:43:36 lfsPentiumRouter linesrv[2104]: LineControl ML Server 2.1.4
started.
Oct  7 20:43:43 lfsPentiumRouter linesrv[2104]: 192.168.1.8:1104 registered
Oct  7 20:43:49 lfsPentiumRouter linesrv[2104]: 192.168.1.8:1104 online
Oct  7 20:44:19 lfsPentiumRouter linesrv[2104]: 192.168.1.8:1104 online
(...)
Oct  7 20:44:58 lfsPentiumRouter linesrv[2104]: cleanup(): cought signal 11
Oct  7 20:45:08 lfsPentiumRouter linesrv[2104]: 1 lines are still active.
Close them manually!
Oct  7 20:45:08 lfsPentiumRouter linesrv[2104]: SEGFAULT, please report to
sf...@gm...
Oct  7 20:45:08 lfsPentiumRouter linesrv[2104]: Value of segf_indicator: 16


Those 2 lines above where 192.168.1.8 gets online twice are related to that
bug report I issued earlier.
As we can see, there is no offline() called by the client in the middle.
Each of those calls would call isdn-up twice and isdn-off once

I don't see much info here but...
About the segfault, this seems the problem introduceb by my change to get
multiple ISP, as that
"safety code" I cuted would mask whatever is the problem here by forcing the
lines to close...

I'm back to plain vannilla linesrv 2.1.0 for now, as it seems the more
stable about this segfault

Somehow I get the feeling that if the newer version have some work around
this problem, it has been away from the real cause of it and it will get
away eventually only in the new 3.x version... So maybe lets not bother too
much about this!


Greetings to you all and next weekend maybe I'll send you some more goodies
:)
«»«»«»«» Joao Clemente «» jp...@rn... «»«»«»«»
Well... it's not really a leak, is it?
The memory will be returned when the user reboots ...
«»«»«»«» ( Maybe a known OS philosophy? ) «»«»«»«»