Re: [Line6linux-devel] Impulse response test

[Stefan H. <ste...@gm...>]

On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Markus Grabner <gr...@ic...> wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 29. November 2012, 21:18:11 schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
>> The Kconfig entry notes that doing the impulse response test inside
>> the kernel avoids buffering/latency issues but it's not clear to me
>> that this code really needs to be in the kernel.  If a userspace
>> impulse response test application uses the same buffer size as the PCM
>> USB traffic, then it should be just as good?
> This is not possible with a PCM API at least for the PODxt since subsequent
> packages in the stream vary in size

Interesting, I didn't know the buffer size can change.

Stefan