From: Michael V. <mv...@qu...> - 2003-10-30 20:53:07
|
At 11:47 AM 10/30/2003, Jakob Eriksson wrote: >Andrew G. Tereschenko wrote: > >>Yep ... >>Completely agree.. >>I've done some changes in Int80 code, but nobody has even reviewed it and >>not commited to CVS. >> >>I dislike idea to add one more fork to existing LINE and umlwin32 but it >>looks like this is a must. >>If somebody would like to share his time or ideas it will nice to bring this >>project to life. >> > >AFAIK SourceForge allows for taking over "dead" projects. If somebody has the time/ideas, I think a better use of their time would be to resurrect umlwin32 rather than LINE. Just my 2 cents, for what it's worth. Michael >>If this is possible - I preffer to make CygWin free emulation. (probably >>some code can be copied - but this is subject to license research). >>Also another goal will be security to allow usage of this library in >>multiuser/server enviroment. >> > >Cygwin is GPL, so no problem copying their code. > > > >regards, >Jakob > > > > >------------------------------------------------------- >This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. >Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it >help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help >YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ >_______________________________________________ >line-devel mailing list >lin...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/line-devel |