Sorry I wasn't able to make the UI meeting this morning (dhardisty and myself are trying to alternate Saturdays). I"ll look through the chat transcript and the PDF and come up with some comments to mail out this week.


On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 8:22 AM, Holger Rothemund <> wrote:
Sorry that I didn't send anything before, but I had a pretty busy week, so I only managed to bring my ideas and thoughts to "paper" tonight. As it would be too late to send it to others for review, I just send it to everyone. It is work in progress anyway, so nothing final, nothing made out of stone.

It should be a base to start discussion. It is my initial point of view, so I would like to receive your input: different ideas, criticism, amendments, etc.

There are a few things that might be different to what the Limers are currently used to. If you don't like it, you don't want to follow this path, it is fine with me. But I would like you to be open and think honestly about it. If you then still really don't like it: yell at me, send me your opinions, your improvements, whatever! But think about it. Now is the time to make real changes. Once LS2 is established, major changes to wording and structure will not be possible anymore.

I think what is most important: we have to use a clear and specific language. The different "areas" of LS2 have to be clearly seperated. Wording is not fixed. But I think the terms I am using are quite clear. However, there are often 2-3 terms that would describe the different areas quite well, but we probably could use a different wording as well. So, read through it (10 pages with not too much content, so it should be done quite fast).

As I couldn't figure out how to add this to the wiki, I just send a link:

So this should be the base for tomorrows discussion!

See you there.



limesurvey-developers mailing list

Jon Westfall
Postdoctoral Research Scholar - Center for Decision Sciences, Columbia Business School
Contributing Editor - Pocket PC Thoughts, Microsoft MVP (Windows Mobile Devices)