Re: [Lightbringer-devel] Developer Guidelines

[Seth Y. <se...@ya...>]

Simon wrote:
> I would name BOL interfaces differently than CS interfaces for clarity 
> purposes. Maybe prefix them with boliInterface/biInterface.
> Browsing a bit through the CS I find the CamelCase is used for classes 
> and functions, however for variables it's the_long_one. Variables also 
> don't seem to use any notation so we probably won't to.
> 

I agree about naming BoL interfaces differently. Another idea is iBolInterface. 
This is the way CEL does it for many things (e.g. iCelEntity). The 
implementation could be named like bolClass.

Seth