From: Dima K <di...@ya...> - 2003-05-29 01:38:43
|
--- Thomas Reitelbach <th...@li...> wrote: > I'd suggest to use "NULL" instead of "0" because it is less > confusing. > I don't know any system where NULL != 0 so it should not make any > difference > (in a technical view). There are obscure systems (very obscure) where NULL != 0x0000 but C and C++ define 0 to be equivalent to NULL as far as pointers are concerned so it is up to the compiler to handle it properly. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM). http://calendar.yahoo.com |