From: Jon K. <jo...@li...> - 2003-05-29 00:27:06
|
> I'd suggest to use "NULL" instead of "0" because it is less > confusing. I don't know any system where NULL != 0 so it should not > make any difference > (in a technical view). I have always preferred using 0, NULL is a C relic. Some compilers even support nil, yuck! Jon |