Re: [libxml++] Glib::ustring, lBoost Lib, and libstdc++

[<Loi...@re...>]

> De la part de Tom Browder

> A couple of years ago I participated in a thread here discussing=20
> decoupling libxml++'s dependency on the whole of Glib and friends.
> Among other things discussed was possible substitutes for ustring.
>=20
> Now I've come back to ask if there has been any thought to proposing=20
> that ustring be made a member of the Boost library (for possible=20
> future incorporation into the C++ standard library).

UTF8 string are certainly considered for the C++ standard. They would =
probably not look like Glib::ustring, however, but like an instanciation =
of basic_string with a specific char_trait. Here are last versions of =
the standard evolution papers about UTF8 support in the standard:

http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2007/n2295.html (UTF8 =
litteral) =
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2007/n2149.html (UTF8 =
char) http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2007/n2238.html =
(UTF8 in the SL)

--
Lo=EFc