Re: [libxml++] Glib::ustring, lBoost Lib, and libstdc++

[Trappel M. <mar...@ks...>]

Seems a great idea to me ... I probably could start using libxml++ then =
:-)

Though that will probably for the boost / glib people to decide?

best regards / mit freundlichen Gr=FC=DFen,
Martin Trappel
=20

> -----Original Message-----
> From: lib...@li...=20
> [mailto:lib...@li...]=20
> On Behalf Of Tom Browder
> Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2007 1:45 AM
> To: lib...@li...
> Subject: [libxml++] Glib::ustring, lBoost Lib, and libstdc++
>=20
> A couple of years ago I participated in a thread here=20
> discussing decoupling libxml++'s dependency on the whole of=20
> Glib and friends.
> Among other things discussed was possible substitutes for ustring.
>=20
> Now I've come back to ask if there has been any thought to=20
> proposing that ustring be made a member of the Boost library=20
> (for possible future incorporation into the C++ standard library).
>=20
> I've looked around a fair amount and it seems to me that=20
> ustring is a strong candidate for that honor.  I've searched=20
> the archives here and have seen no such discussion, so=20
> perhaps there may be interest.
>=20
> Comments?
>=20
> Thanks.
>=20
> -Tom
>=20
> Tom Browder
> Niceville, Florida
> USA
>=20
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -----------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
> Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
> Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and=20
> a browser.
> Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> =20
> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________
> Libxmlplusplus-general mailing list
> Lib...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libxmlplusplus-general
>=20