Re: [libxml++] Re: Libxmlplusplus-general digest, Vol 1 #293 - 1 msg

[Daniel V. <vei...@re...>]

On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 11:07:43AM -0400, Kurt M. Brown wrote:
> I agree that a generic C++ API for xml would be useful; one the closely
> matches: http://www.w3.org/DOM/.

  which totally sucks because it mandates UTF-16 strings.
There is a good reason I didn't tried to implement "real" DOM in
libxml2, I woudn't have been conformant anyway because there i no
way I would have agreed to constantly recode UTF-16 to UTF-8 and
back. C++ API for DOM is defined as the output of C++ header generator
on the CORBA bindings, eek :-(

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Desktop team http://redhat.com/
vei...@re...  | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/