From: Christophe de V. <cde...@al...> - 2004-08-13 23:32:25
|
Thomas Jarosch wrote: >>I personnaly did not try to extract Glib::ustring. Can't help on this. >>However you don't need GTK+ to install glibmm-2.4, which depends only on >>glib. This make the dependencies much lower than you suggest. >>FYI: >>http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=3923642&forum_id=127 >> >> > >We do this in our custom RPM specfile: > > [snip big patch to get rid of Glib::ustring] Is there a particular reason for you to get rid if Glib::ustring ? Is there other people doing such a thing ? |