From: Christophe de V. <cde...@al...> - 2004-02-06 10:01:29
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jim Garrison wrote: | On Thu, 2004-02-05 at 12:46, Christophe de VIENNE wrote: | |> | The first patch adds cobj() to Document. |> |> Is it a real need to have it ? I'd prefer not to introduce it. | | | There is no need for it as long as the API is and always will be | all-encompassing. In the same way, there is no need for | Node::cobj() as far as I know. If Document::cobj() existed in 1.0, | it would be easier to work around the lack of the | create_root_node_by_import function. | | Really, I just consider it standard that the application programmer | can access the underlying C object if necessary, and I question | why it is allowed in Node but not Document. At the same time, I | cannot speculate on how useful the Document::cobj() function will | be in the future. We had long threads about this subject some time ago. But you're right the lib is not consistent by providing a cobj() on Node and not on Document. Let's add it. Cheers, Christophe -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFAI2X7B+sU3TyOQjARAnvRAJ40mcMwwVv8lCH3csP+G2Lu32seMwCaA62L TkbzQMmcg0MEJ4MRGvSFeFk= =yX+S -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |