From: Christophe de V. <cde...@al...> - 2003-04-20 11:11:35
|
Le Dimanche 20 Avril 2003 12:36, Christophe de Vienne a =E9crit : > Probably, but in a very short time I'll commit the changes I spoke about = in > a previous thread. So now an assert replace the warning message. This means that some document containing some node type we do not wrap may= =20 crash libxml++. I guess that all the xmlElementType ending with _NODE has to be handled if = we=20 want the assert not to be reached. So the decision to make for now is do we=20 1) implement the missing types 2) remove the assert and silently ignore unknown types. Comments / ideas are welcome Regards, Christophe |