Re: [libxml++] Vote: templates everywhere v. Glib::ustring: results + I'm back

[Stefan S. <se...@sy...>]

Christophe de VIENNE wrote:

> But before the definitive choice, I would really like the discussion about an 
> intermediate solution, with specialized classes for glib::ustring and QString 
> in a library, and the possibility to use the fully templated classes, to go 
> to a conclusion.

Never mind my suggestion about using libxml++ with QString. So far I was
the only one suggesting that the two might be used together, and as I
don't use libxml++ anyways, there is really no point for you to work on
a specific libxml++_QString solution.

The question is really (IMO) whether to parametrize or not, not whether
or not to support a specific unicode implementation.


Regards,
		Stefan