From: Christophe de V. <cde...@al...> - 2003-02-04 15:49:38
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi folks, It seems we have a small problem :-/ As the official maintener of libxml++, I must say a few words. My goal here is to clarify the situation, and to avoid the project to A few weeks ago we decided with Murray that current API would be the 1.0 one, and that no changes would be done on it, except for bugfix or adding validation. Then Stefan came with really good ideas to make libxml++ a better wrapper of libxml++. More than that, it would permit to implement easily some features like xpath. I'm reminding this to you since, in my opinion, it permit to andersand why Murray did not appreciate that accessors has been *added*, and so the API changed (the initial patch of Stefan almost did not change the API, just reimplemented it differently). Now I must admit that the tone he used would have irritate almost anybody. I won't give reason to one or another of the protagonists, I just don't want the good work of both of you not to be loosed for libxml++. You both have more experience than me and you cannot image how I appreciate your participation on the project. Stefan, the last modifications you added are definitly good ones, but to preserve everybody's nerves, we'll keep them (iterator stuffs) on the unstable branch, and the future 1.0 version will keep the current API. As Murray always did on this project, I invite you to warn us if you're going to commit some changes (backward compatible or not) in the API, so such situations won't (I hope) happen again. Some discussions we had about evolution of the lib were implicitly concerning the future unstable branch. I could have been more explicit about it, sorry. Now I let you both "laver votre linge sale entre vous" ;-) Best regards, Christophe -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAj4/4PMACgkQB+sU3TyOQjBBSACeOuR+19qW2kR3XjcoPj5br7Qy LicAoI7Wk9tLLM/jP1PNY/7Wb22oxqXQ =aQ4h -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |