Re: [Libxmlplusplus-general] NodeLists, AttributeLists, etc.

[Stefan S. <se...@sy...>]

Christophe de Vienne wrote:

> I agree that the Attribute class is no longer switable for this purpose.
> As far as the pair of string, we should keep consistency between this and the 
> way we do for Nodes contents : use templates... and this is true for the 
> other methods too, although I'm not sure it will make things clear/easy (but 
> this may be because it's a bit late for me :-/

yes, I totally agree. We ought to use a consistent approach to represent
character types, and use that throughout the API.

Regards,
		Stefan