Re: [Libxmlplusplus-general] Re: newbie question: libxml++ vs. xerces-C++

[darco <da...@de...>]

I believe that transparent support for std::string is built into 
Glib::ustring... So that internaly, libxml++ could use Glib::ustring 
everywhere, and it would implicitly cast to std::string wherever you 
choose to use it.

That's how I understand it anyway...

On Tuesday, December 17, 2002, at 05:22 PM, Greg S. wrote:

> Just to make sure...
>
> When you talk about switching to Glib::ustring in libxml++, you
> *are* planning to do it in such a way that one can still use
> std::string if they require no unicode support, correct?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Greg
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:
> With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility
> Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance Computing Channel
> http://hpc.devchannel.org/
> _______________________________________________
> Libxmlplusplus-general mailing list
> Lib...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libxmlplusplus-general
>
>
--- darco
http://www.deepdarc.com/