Thanks, Christophe! I ended up just installing iconv, libxml2, libxslt, and
libxml++, using this patch. I agree with Murray that the typedef is a bit
clumsy, but what is one person supposed to do? I had a number of other
issues, specifically getting configure to work and getting symbols to export
(Finally figured out what gendef is for!). Seems to work!
-Bob
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christophe de Vienne [mailto:cde...@al...]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 4:28 AM
> To: Robert S. Grimes
> Cc: lib...@li...
> Subject: Re: [libxml++] Installing for Microsoft Visual Studio 2005
>
>
> Robert,
>
> This might interest you : http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=320197
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Christophe
>
> Robert S. Grimes a écrit :
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > My client uses MSVS 2005 for most of their existing software, but
> > wants to move towards Linux for new/special projects. I am tasked
> > with adding significant XML I/O capabilities, for both platforms, so
> > I'm looking for a good cross-platform approach. It seems libxml++
> > might fit the bill, though I haven't been able to get it to work yet.
> > First, it claims to only work with MSVS 2003, though I probably
> > couldn't make that work either. From the README file in the
> > MSVC_Net2003 directory, I see this:
> >
> > 1. Install the latest Win32 GTK+ Development Environment from the
> > Glade for Windows project, http://gladewin32.sourceforge.net.
> > 2. Build libsigc++ 2.0.6 or later, and glibmm 2.4.7 or later from
> > source.
> > 3. Add GTK+, libsigc++ and glibmm to the include and lib paths in
> > Visual Studio.
> > 4. Load the MSVC_Net2003/libxml++.sln solution.
> > 5. Build the entire solution. Run the tests.
> >
> > Sounds straightforward, though rather complex. I mean, I only want an
> > XML parser! I really don't want all these widgets and all; after all,
> > they will be sticking with MSVS for user interfaces on their Windows
> > machines! The Linux boxes will be servers. But anyway, I can't get
> > libsigc++ to compile, as there are missing resource.h files. Is all
> > this really necessary? Is there a simpler way to go about it? Should
> > I be able to get libxml++ installed by just installing libxml2 and
> > ustring? Has anyone done this successfully?
> >
> >
> > Thanks!
> > -Bob
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Libxmlplusplus-general mailing list
> > Lib...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libxmlplusplus-general
> >
|
