From: Fridrich S. <fri...@bl...> - 2007-06-09 13:37:25
|
Nice to hear you again, Smokey. You cannot imagine how much we miss you :-) Smokey Ardisson wrote: > Aside from stuff about creating a Universal Binary and/or targeting > 10.3.9 as well as 10.4, the Linux stuff should be fine for Mac OS X > as well; building libwpd and its dependencies is the "hard" part ;-) This will disappear with 0.9.x, since libgsf will not be dependency anymore; but it is possible that libwpd will be not the same thing anymore either. Let's see. > Real Mac hackers probably know those bits, too; likely even Fridrich > can fill in the details. My Mac Mini is now having a break resting somewhere in a box :-) > As I'm still on 10.3.9 and only 10.4 can build Universal Binaries, I > can't say with certainty, of course, but at least I can build libwpg > and wpg2odg (again--after some changes that went in cvs in the past > few days) on 10.3.9 with gcc 3.3 (despite the purported gcc 4 > requirement), at least as a shared libs/binaries. Actually, it builds on win32 with gcc 3.4.5 and on CentOS4 with gcc 3.4.6, so lowering requirements could be a solution. Moreover, MSVC 6 and higher on win32 do the job too. > Some of the files I throw at it seem to have minor issues, but I feel > comfortable saying libwpg and friends build and work on Mac OS X. > And the site looks very nice :) Very true, indeed! > Smokey > (still around, just rather busy) The introductory sentence still applies :-) Cheers Fridrich |