From: Ariya H. <ari...@gm...> - 2007-06-04 16:00:11
|
> Aside from stuff about creating a Universal Binary and/or targeting > 10.3.9 as well as 10.4, the Linux stuff should be fine for Mac OS X > as well; building libwpd and its dependencies is the "hard" part ;-) > Real Mac hackers probably know those bits, too; likely even Fridrich > can fill in the details. > > As I'm still on 10.3.9 and only 10.4 can build Universal Binaries, I > can't say with certainty, of course, but at least I can build libwpg > and wpg2odg (again--after some changes that went in cvs in the past > few days) on 10.3.9 with gcc 3.3 (despite the purported gcc 4 > requirement), at least as a shared libs/binaries. Thanks, Smokey. That's certainly an important information. > Some of the files I throw at it seem to have minor issues, but I feel > comfortable saying libwpg and friends build and work on Mac OS X. Would it be good if you can write the details in a separate web page, e.g. "Building for Mac OS X"? I can prepare the template and fill it with some info from the linux page. What do you think? Regards, Ariya |