From: Xiaofan C. <xia...@gm...> - 2011-03-26 03:18:03
|
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 3:20 AM, Peter Stuge <pe...@st...> wrote: > Phi...@mi... wrote: >> Once a company or organization purchases a VID, they then "own" >> their PIDs and, short of selling them, can do what they will with >> them. Is this correct? > > This matches my understanding following my communication with USB-IF. > >> Maybe we could have Xiaofan restate his original concern/problem >> about obtaining VID/PIDs. > > There are a few concerns, which are all legitimate: > > 1. The $2000 threshold of an own VID is high for amateur device > developers, and it also seems a little wasteful to allocate one VID > for what may be a single project. > > 2. Many USB chip vendors are happy to help smaller customers with a > PID allocation from the chip vendor's pool. But often chip vendors > (quite understandably) then require that the VID and PID will only be > used in projects using the vendor's chips. Very good summary. Indeed these are my main concerns. > I wouldn't even call it intellectual property. It is a number > assignment in a standardized context. > > My impression is very much that USB-IF would have no objections > against an organization that manages PID assignments for projects > which can not themselves climb the $2000 threshold, and raising that > sum is not such a big deal if a bunch of people get together. But the > devil is, as always, in the details; running the organization needs > to be planned and criteria needs to be agreed upon, for it to be > successful and worthwhile. I agree. > I can completely understand that USB-IF do not want to *be* that > organization. They have a different purpose. > I agree. -- Xiaofan |