From: Xiaofan C. <xia...@gm...> - 2011-03-24 22:50:29
|
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 5:19 AM, Peter Stuge <pe...@st...> wrote: > Тихомиров Валентин wrote: >> I wonder why nobody so far implemented my idea - purchasing a VID >> and selling the PIDs. > > Somebody has already done this, and have been stopped, because USB-IF > does not allow selling product ids. Wouter is one of them. He has stopped after getting letters from USB-IF. http://www.voti.nl/shop/catalog.html?USB-PID-10 http://www.voti.nl/docs/usb-pid.html This one has got its VID revoked even though they are still selling... http://www.mcselec.com/index.php?page=shop.product_details&flypage=shop.flypage&product_id=92&option=com_phpshop&Itemid=1 > > As for test devices I think it is very important to use different > vidpids for each actual different device. If it is not the same > design then it should not have the same vidpid IMO. What do you mean by different design? I think as long as the end function is the same, the VID/PID combination can be the same even if different MCU/MPU is used. For example, Linux based Gadget driver will have the same VID/PID with given functions even though the MPU used can be different. -- Xiaofan |