From: Peter S. <pe...@st...> - 2010-12-08 02:17:15
|
Segher Boessenkool wrote: > >> _Release_ tarballs, which we should have no matter what. > > > > We do have those, they're generated by Daniel using a Makefile rule. > > So throw it in cron and you have snapshots. Plus or minus a little > twiddling for version strings. They also upload to SF, and yes assume that it's a particular version. Not big things to fix, but things to fix, and could get something more general running instead, with not much more effort, I think. > > Source snapshots would probably be easy enough to set up, but we (I) > > want binary snapshots too, maybe even more so than source. > > What is a "binary snapshot"? Binary packages at least for Windows, but maybe other systems too. (I e.g. sat in on the end of a debian packaging workshop, that's a good format to reach a lot of users.) //Peter |