From: Peter S. <pe...@st...> - 2010-12-08 01:18:38
|
Segher Boessenkool wrote: > >>> If we automate making release tarballs/zipfiles (and we should), > >>> it is trivial to use the same thing for snapshots as well Agree, but I think it will be more the other way around; once we have snapshots working that will work for releases too. :) > > I have not been making a distinction between tarballs and snapshots. > > Is there one? > > _Release_ tarballs, which we should have no matter what. We do have those, they're generated by Daniel using a Makefile rule. Source snapshots would probably be easy enough to set up, but we (I) want binary snapshots too, maybe even more so than source. Maybe that's wrong though, and source snapshots would be fine as well? Hmm. //Peter |