Re: [Libusb-devel] CRLF in files checked out on Windows

[Michael P. <mic...@gm...>]

Segher Boessenkool wrote:
>> (An exception perhaps is the MSVC project files; I think everyone
>> agrees we should have those marked as binary?)

No.  They should be CRLF text in the working copy, and I don't care how
they're stored in the repo.

Incidentally, calling things "binary" or "text" and expecting people to
assume that the latter means LF is going to confuse people, since DOS and
Windows have always assumed the other way around (fopen(filename, "rt") only
opens CRLF files, e.g.).


Michael