From: Pete B. <pb...@gm...> - 2010-12-06 14:19:44
|
On 2010.12.06 14:14, Xiaofan Chen wrote: > That being said, I do not see any files need to be forced > to be CRLF, even the text files (the two files with .txt > extension from libusb-pbatard). The are not CRLF > in my checkout so it is not good to use Notepad > to view it. Is that a problem? Not a problem for me. Neither is it for me. As I said, if people want to go with something else than -crlf on files that we would prefer to be CRLF'd always, I'm fine with it. We're only playing for safety on those, and assuming that we might get issues if someone ever gets an LF'd file that should have been CRLF'd. But what I have an objection to is not enforcing files that should always be LF as LF, when I have seen 3 *separate* issues on not doing that, and the other proposal is *rely* on users following what we tell them to, while we can just do that for them by using binary mode always. Regards, /Pete |