From: Michael P. <mic...@gm...> - 2010-12-05 18:22:15
|
Pete Batard wrote: >> On 5 December 2010 04:43, Michael Plante <mic...@gm...> wrote: >> > And why are private branches less of a big deal? >> >> Private branches off a clearly flagged "EXPERIMENTAL" [1] branch are >> not a big deal, and never will be when the problems faced by those >> branches are not *logically* expected to find their way into official. What about public branches off an "experimental" branch? In other words, you've subtly altered the subject here. I was asking public versus private, not "where did it come from". Regards, Michael |