Re: [Libusb-devel] libusb-1.0 windows backend now in Cygwin packages

[Simone c. <che...@te...>]

Hi Samuel,

are you going to package libusb-pbatard.git as "experimental" ? I want to be
100% sure it's not something wrong I do that leads to my issues (for example
make install will not replace cybusb-1.0.dll).

Thank you.

Simone

-----Original Message-----
From: Samuel Thibault [mailto:sam...@en...] 
Sent: lunedì 4 ottobre 2010 21:39
To: lib...@li...
Subject: Re: [Libusb-devel] libusb-1.0 windows backend now in Cygwin
packages

Peter Stuge, le Mon 04 Oct 2010 21:28:54 +0200, a écrit :
> However - what to package is of course completely up to the packager!
> :) I'd recommend staying close to libusb.git, but on the other hand 
> it's interesting to get more testing for code in libusb-pbatard.git.

I could actually package both: the cygwin installer permits to provide
"experimental" versions.

BTW, if somebody feels he has both time and cygwin competence, feel free to
ask me for adopting the libusb packages, I don't have as much time to spend
on it as one could like.

Samuel

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Virtualization is moving to the mainstream and overtaking non-virtualized
environment for deploying applications. Does it make network security easier
or more difficult to achieve? Read this whitepaper to separate the two and
get a better understanding.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/hp-phase2-d2d
_______________________________________________
Libusb-devel mailing list
Lib...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libusb-devel