From: Xiaofan C. <xia...@gm...> - 2010-08-23 03:02:04
|
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 10:51 AM, Michael Plante <mic...@gm...> wrote: > Xiaofan Chen wrote: >>> lib >>> MinGW64 >>> static >>> libusb-1.0.a >>> import >>> libusb-1.0.dll.a >>> MinGW64 >>> static >>> libusb-1.0.lib >>> import >>> libusb-1.0.lib > > Did you mean MSVC64 for the second case? (this appears repeated for both > "lower-status" and "higher-status" case) You are right. The second MinGW64 should be MSVC64. > >>> binary >>> x86 >>> lsusb.exe >>> xusb.exe >>> dpfp.exe >>> x64 >>> lsusb.exe >>> xusb.exe >>> dpfp.exe > > You listed dpfp.exe in the "lower-status" case, but omitted it in the > "higher-status" case. Are we still building dpfp on Windows? > I think I was able to build dpfp under MinGW at some point since Pete has some patches for it. I need to check again. If not, it should be dropped in the binary. I would still like to keep dpfp.c though and patch it so that it can be built under MinGW at least. It is a good example to show the use of async API. -- Xiaofan |