From: Daniel D. <ds...@ge...> - 2008-02-25 13:46:37
|
Ludovic Rousseau wrote: > For a timeout of 10ms we have an error max of 69% without the patch > and 19% with the patch. > For 100ms it is 15% without the patch and 18% with the patch. > > I would say that the use of the patch (greatly) improves the precision > of timeout for a short value of timeout. And the error is not really > worse for longer timeouts. That's great, thanks so much for checking it in such detail :) Daniel |